No. 18-7240
Charles Jermaine King, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: career-offender constitutional-rights criminal-history criminal-procedure due-process guidelines habeas-corpus recidivism recidivist sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant was properly treated as a recidivist?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED IN ROSALES MIRELES V US, JUSTICE ALITO ASKED DURING THE ORAL THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT WHETHER A DEFENDANT WAS PROPERLY TREATED AS A of Oral Argument of 16-9493). : ; THE PETITIONER IS REQUESTING FOR THE COURT TO ADDRESS THIS NOVEL AND IMPORTANT QUESTION ,IN ORDER TO GET THE THOUSANDS LIKE THE PETITIONER OUT OF THE PRISON AND SAVE THE TAX DOLLARS..BY ; RESTORING THE LIFE AND LIBERTY OF THESE LINGERING IN PRISONS. "os (4a) : : 4
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 4, 2019)
2018-09-25
Application (18A345) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 4, 2018 to January 3, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2018-09-04
Application (18A345) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 3, 2019.
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent