No. 18-7242
Dauntorian Lyndel Sanders v. Arizona
IFP
Tags: constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment precedent sixth-amendment supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Arizona follows the precedent of Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), as set forth in Lynch v. Arizona, 136 S. Ct. 1818 (2016)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Arizona follows the precedent of Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154 (1994), as set forth in Lynch v. Arizona, 136 S. Ct. 1818 (2016). i
Docket Entries
2019-03-20
Reply of petitioner Dauntorian Sanders filed.
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-05
Brief of respondent State of Arizona in opposition filed.
2018-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2019)
Attorneys
State of Arizona
Andrew Stuart Reilly — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Andrew Stuart Reilly — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent