No. 18-7248

Vertis Anthony v. Louis Boyd, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-suppression fourth-amendment judicial-bias jurisdiction probable-cause rules-of-civil-procedure standing subject-matter-jurisdiction warrantless-search
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erred in its rulings on the jurisdictional issues raised in the petition

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : ac wa 4 4 QUESTIONS) a " / , 1 ow a, nNewes i c “i of the LY. on whe oun ow fey plac feel Cand wher Re legal Sele sim VuMain unvesslved vu an atteble ” Can “ t S 350“ ev oinel a Soak who nas nol! bear Served natenaniers J (3) Whether if a proceeding before Jecge Soe ovo itnat~ ion of witness ov whee Dees id upon Segcodion wm (81, tonfesso,Violaled defendants’ sbalslens right? (#) Failure 4, give noice to Roce by demure bo ancrd Arend uentto bill and where ruling on deoturver, deprived deLen | dank of his right ta ovisieg Svunt answer f Ovigtinal bill ? | Ab. Gey BA fle & CR le 3. Fa et a ce) @®whe er ir Ureigh paper in ola WO b being withark the Sanaluve of Ne d,Was nob pantie tA AM eeeM CAN Wii fo. Code 0 B40, Seas. i Whether tf one yeer ba lies tan beSSeaepemg nent ome yor i n Ovurs v e in al iy an se is within LS = dickion of a tiajaivste, tbe prsee seeution i required fe Gna offense pos viol iS the Ghavging inolvcnten tose ndb tn cay Whether iS) Hs Made evvonenus jyudgnient upon Ajnamics ofa pro confesso iniplicales delaulh Sr wanl & pro Al Cade Tlle (Sy 1015 8 ti-e-20 teamugh Bi Aatonn2. Con | bicolor, page arg, (a) whe ie naniz Batok: “ vounds Sa fesault F. cad oe tMlemglel heanalh Eade Hosoail Ty, Apccdine” on the cov paiol has involved 2 ; | Code THe 13,1415 8 BA-4-2 © (0) Whether LP Mabaata i empls graded ak GW eur, t ee _s y pow the (at Sete of Vint Semel inter, explicl{y plicable nN conouninaiel vi cides, ) applicable aleo dy at angled _Nuvdew-Suprease ob Ma(2004940 Se 2d WW ifoekvell vSkele Al. Codes Ale (2, Vol. Stats’ 8 -19-11-4 | GayWhether Fa case Pibed in the Civeuil Cour user virlhsn He, extlusive, Jeiisdickion of a dighich tout, i3 the A Prled £, unisdiction © , GrwWhelhor Oa case Bled sn the Creutl Cre and Cheuld hove 3 Gown ober eS G San he tah cn the Civeul Court Cheese +o verain Oviainel duviedection a8 vefuse he woke is appellate unedeckion do secune “ite hdldings upon Onitinall Wesoludion ak kvval Court? Ala. Cos e Lll Le 12 Val ll ‘ats § 12-12-41 Cry Whether cP the De Caw er cehee® untedtchion v sadly oF cone tal Ta el ele ond LBS) we : ion wht Vane: a Paes +o a total es § {508-7 gave the oa Balcones dechion of the caseZ Ma. Cole 7 tle LZV UW, ‘wis’ $ 124 Os) Nhether of wi Cas fo vemtain wn vis Oriaine TUS \ A gai eal ck a fe aa ge flopanls that ruled upon the Nerve mM \urisd: il ¢ortroyer ta Cog tHe ay ol casts. a lnk \ . ‘Aion, Maintenance, ett... , C A apeelfabe pnisdtchion , wap geal wos wetves Th af dubes upon the _ Ale. Code. ie 12, Vol. LL, ‘tags! 8 12-12-12 qt) Whe! if the vs rf Cour aving pisartionel Mates in contvoversy lees than $6,000." upon Sapor haw eee Seda hed om rind elec hh. Code THe. 12,Vol: tL “wys"" 8 (2-12-30, 8 po sou) Gad Whether if the Circutt Court exclusive duvtsdection exer Ci&ed over all Cases aloae 4 10) C00. fe. Cate, {He Walt, "iets “a ira-20 Mf ci -P. Bole Blea . per §1z-12-3l Exoluave dunsa: Seal Clauss . Ala. Col Le ln Voll ins “8 aot we Gayw P ned we) du, oe Shing woplait ary all cde elected ug tine i. Mon of ether wnweking hs S hmends privilege ws Hhe cual of snappre priate Wtnveowdion. See, 812-124, Bie L231 Ca) | and S1S-3-25, . ) | Mla. Code, (He 12, Vbl. “1975” | (22) page lO» Whelhey ib duvichiclion i Joloniiwed fou Re AML of vecaveny Ordered br he loner Cove a TUT ve Mabou, $68 Se Se CAla. (vss . (23) page. ‘eg Whether mike ae Gite Controversy delersrimed by urishichin Sov punpase dp leratins whether a case enn be Sov vn the Comyplaanl Hursusect 4, kav Craw Qed? 468 So. 24 VIS. | GAS Rge U0 TE original evil Surtglichin— wheter £ rd Khe Seite eras Ril ei ol (2s)page (10 . WhebRoy £ the yunedechional ahowid wii be Shown on agpeas pursuant be Cosky. Suds: 10 Ma. Ape. £7, GS So. |W Ext) bohether if the Civeust Cour l in dleeting “|. original ur Wisdiction duving the Appellate Proceedings Would mol, cole. ‘the Cour lp] | jud dent] Being bias. whereupon all judguents conducted during Pail proceedings \acKed the Coweetwe (Process of the

Docket Entries

2019-07-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-04-11
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-20
Application (18A833) denied by Justice Thomas.
2019-02-05
Application (18A833) for bail, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2019-02-05
Waiver of right of respondents Louis Boyd, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2018-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2019)

Attorneys

Louis Boyd, Warden, et al.
Yvonne A. H. SaxonOffice of the Attorney General, State of Alabama, Respondent
Yvonne A. H. SaxonOffice of the Attorney General, State of Alabama, Respondent
Vertis Anthony
Vertis Anthony — Petitioner
Vertis Anthony — Petitioner