Whether Petitioner has standing to challenge Respondents' business practices

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Petitioner, an indigenous landowner and a United States citizen has standing to challenge whether Respondents, Samson Resources Corporations’ business practice of ignoring Texas Resources, Title | Examination and Property Codes when conducting business to cause Petitioner and other indigenous landowners to be paid unfairly, leased to unfairly and fraud out of property in the form of land, minerals, hydrocarbons and royalties, violated the established clause of the fifth amendment of the United States Constitution? 2. Whether Petitioner, as an indigenous landowner and a United States Citizen ; has standing to challenge whether the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware, Unsecure Creditors Committee, now the Settlement Trust Committee’s opposition to assigning a Third Party Examiner and Legal Counsel to Petitioner and other indigenous landowners in Respondents Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, violated the established fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution? 3. Whether Respondent should continue to benefit and profit from the atrocities of slavery that once was an integral part of life in East Texas and Louisiana that permitted evil men to take land, minerals, hydrocarbons from indigenous landowners by any means necessary in spite of the fact that slavery was abolished by the thirteenth amendment? 4 tert ae Wy 74 : wt