No. 18-7253
Eugene E. Forte v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-disobedience civil-rights collateral-bar-rule constitutional-order criminal-enforcement due-process first-amendment free-speech judicial-precedent unconstitutional-orders walker-v-birmingham
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment
FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this Court reverse Walker v. City of Birmingham
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should this Court reverse Walker v. City of Birmingham, 388 U.S. 307, 87 S.Ct. 1824, 18 L-Ed.2d 1210 (1967) on the ground that the collateral bar rule violates the First Amendment by requiring criminal enforcement of unconstitutional orders? i
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2018-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Eugene Forte
Douglas J Beevers — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
Douglas J Beevers — Office of the Federal Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent