Whether the lower court clearly erred in abusing its discretion by dismissing the appeal as premature/no jurisdiction without addressing the merits of the Rule 60(b) motion alleging attorney dishonesty (fraud-on-the-court), and whether a denial of a Rule 60(b) motion is separately appealable and requires a COA or permission to appeal

QUESTION PRESENTED Since denial of the pre-judgment Rule SO(b) motion in habeas did not address inerits of attorney dishonesty did lower court clearly err abusing discretion, dismissing appeal as premature/no jurisdiction, without addressing merits nor if Rule : 60(b) is limited to federal judgments, whether denial is separately appealable, whether COA or permission to appeal is required and should issue? . i