No. 18-7265
Rodney Scot Armstrong, Jr. v. Michigan
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure closing-argument de-novo-review directed-verdict legal-preservation motion objection preservation-of-error preservation-of-issues prosecutorial-misconduct standard-of-review trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a motion for a directed verdict an objection that preserves an issue for and mandates de novo review?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED : . I. Is a motion for a directed verdict an : . objection that preserves an issue for and ' mandates de novo revieu? Petitioner answers, "Yea. ; Respondent has not ansuered. oo, . It. Was the use af a compilation video during clasing argument without seeking its admittance prosecutor miscanduct or a visual aid? Petitioner answers that it was prosecutor misconduct. ; Respondent has not answered. : : ue . wie TABLE GF CONTENTS S Questions Presented ... ee 2 i Parties =... es '
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Rodney Scot Armstrong, Jr.
Rodney Scot Armstrong Jr. — Petitioner
Rodney Scot Armstrong Jr. — Petitioner