Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for violation of their civil rights and due process rights under the 14th Amendment

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW : 1. Did the United States Sentencing Commission exceed their ‘ statutory authority under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, in Amendment 268, by replacing 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) definition for the term "crime of violence" with 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)'s definition for the term "violent felony." 2. Does the Sentencing Reform Act's 28 U.S.C. 994(h) mandate of a ‘ a sentence of imprisonment "at or near the maximum term "under the statute of conviction render the procedural guideline calculation ; used to arrive at that sentence a vehicle for increasing the minimum sentence that can be imposed under the statute of conviction. 3. Does Johnson, and Dimaya's invalidation of 18 U.S.C. § 16(b)'s risk of force clause render every civil or criminal statute defined oo by U.S.C. § 16(b), suchags 28 U.S.C. § 994(h) and § 924(c)(3)(b) : . unconstitutionally vague. . Y. Does the United Stedes Sentences Guicklines violate clue Process by Using Vhe ACCAS cesicdual clauye +e increase a guideline Sentence in eacess OF Fhe Steckubory Mafimum Under the count . of eonviction , ii