No. 18-7280
Michael Wappler v. Wayne Ivey, et al.
IFP
Tags: civil-rights confinement-conditions constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pre-trial-detention pretrial-detention standing three-strikes-rule
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner, an indigent pretrial detainee, prevented from challenging pretrial conditions of confinement by the improper assessment of a 'strike' under the 3-strikes rule, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, contrary to the Constitution of the United States First Amendment Petition Clause and/or Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WAS PETITIONER, AN INDIGENT PRETRIAL DETAINEE, PREVENTED FROM CHALLENGING PRETRIAL CON. DITIONS OF CONFINEMENT BY | THE IMPROPER ASSESSHENT OF | —A'STRIKE (ONDER THE 3-STRIRES | RULE, 2S 0.5.C.8 1915 @ CONTRARY | TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES FIRST AMENDPIENT | PETITION CLAUSE AND/OR FOURTEENTH AMENDHENT DUE PROCESS | CLAUSE ?
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)