Whether the differences raised in the opinions that need to be addressed in a higher court

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ° xz. Queso rN _S_}_R Ad-5-6-0-——F EIN Rot Au TH én OU WOE a ARPERC » Ano TAS caceoanin susaeme couar ——_HAve _SéMiors ODIFFEeReNces Qmiseo TN Then OP Asoms TAT NEGO “To BE ADDRESSED TN A Wicher SORT OF LA IT. Questiens) Were Roaisen seecann Ne Bot ——} Pw Amo AeroOat _ aca 3 PRESENTED 1 TWEE ——_<OANT OF 27 AD. LH, tia ec ouat Retain SME Dis caetion ——Te___Dis Miss A STRIKE Uumoem PRoe, C4 2 we AND JOR. SENATE Bice ~GOe AV QuUasTiom) WAS PETTIcoNER Unitéo strates SON STITUTION AL RAGIN Mio tavtéo Gunner AWWe = 9 A'S Amenoment, ( AICHT To pue PRosess ) MW QuUES Tian) S WOULD. SokeRio-. RiuwwZ. Wi. SE Ssion, ¥Gl 63d. IB 3_CAN cin. Aol) ACPLY To Petitioner claace oF EAR TACKING AS AN MON-VielL ave. PRrok __ A LO a po 7 a a EE OS