No. 18-7292
Marco Whitley, Sr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege attorney-client-relationship crime-of-violence criminal-law due-process eighth-circuit prejudice second-degree-robbery sentencing sixth-amendment violent-crime
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Eighth Circuit err by holding Missouri's Second Degree Robbery is always considered to necessarily be a crime of violence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED C Did the Eighth Circuit err by holding Missouri's Second Degree — . Robbery is always considered to necessarily be a crime of violence? , O Did the Eighth Circuit err in failing to articulate whether intentional and unjustified intrusions upon the attorney-client relationship can violate the Sixth Amendment absent proof of prejudice?
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Marco Whitley, Sr.
Marco Whitley Sr. — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent