No. 18-7298
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland civil-rights conviction criminal-procedure due-process false-testimony incarceration prison-sentence prosecutorial-misconduct state-action wrongful-conviction
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause excuses the State of Florida's use of false testimony in the procurement of a conviction and 13-year prison sentence when the State of Florida should have known that the testimony solicited by the prosecutor was, in fact, false
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Due Process Clause excuses the State of Florida’s use of false testimony in the procurement of a conviction and 13-year prison sentence when the State of Florida should have known that the testimony solicited by the prosecutor was, in fact, false. i LIST OF ALL
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-07
Supplement to motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner Nicole M. Moore.
2019-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2019-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)
Attorneys
Florida
Nicole M. Moore
Jason Michael Miller — Najmy Thompson P.L., Petitioner