Whether Rosemond v. United States was wrongly interpreted and applied

QUESTION PRESENTED [1] WHETHER ‘ROSEMOND v. UNITED STATES, 134 S.Ct. 1240 (2014), WAS WRONGLY INTERPRETED AND APPLIED BY THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS WHEN IT UPHELD MR. RIVERA'S CONVICTIONS FOR AIDING AND ABETTING MR. THOMAS'S ARMED ROBBERIES OF THE TWO DOLLAR STORES EVEN THOUGH NO EVIDENCE WAS PRESENTED AT TRIAL THAT MR. RIVERA KNEW MR. THOMAS WAS GOING TO COMMIT THE ROBBERIES, THAT MR. RIVERA TOOK ANY ACT IN FURTHERANCE OF THE ROBBERIES, OR THAT MR. RIVERA HAD ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE THAT MR. THOMAS WAS GOING TO USE A GUN DURING THE ROBBERIES. [2] WHETHER THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION WHEN IT DECLINED TO GRANT MR. RIVERA A NEW TRIAL EVEN THOUGH MR. THOMAS WAS [NOT] A CREDIBLE WITNESS AND NO OTHER EVIDENCE CORROBORATED THAT MR. RIVERA AIDED AND ABETTED MR. THOMAS'S ROBBERIES OF THE TWO DOLLAR STORES AND BRANDISHING OF A FIREARM DURING A CRIME OF VIOLENCE. — G)