Keenan G. Wilkins, aka Nerrah Brown v. Paul Gonzalez, et al.
Whether the reasoning of the Court in Buck v. Davis (2017) 137 S.Ct. 759 also applies to the Court of Appeals
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Oe i. Dsoeg Tha Rea soning of Ths Ceurt Assorted m9 Buck Vv Bavis (2017) 137 S.Ct. 759 al&o apply +e Cul Appeals @ (ice. Dhen alt V6 loefore the Court 1S Udhether te atloes =eP Status on Aopeal --~ Cay t+he Court Aecide +he Mets of the cnboriefed appeal, ialoe( it “Fry tous” and Casntk i+ ag o Deaotan sis sstrKe 2), Kh. Can Frlawntflos Aspeal Seeking we Chal\enae a Deisstret Courts dsm, 66a of brs entire complaunt for ALaced improper Seradac ef Clarms Vn SShich Three of Ke Defendants. ace the Sarnia in each Clormm lee Colled “ Fenitous” | under fis Courts Standards hed in Neit2ke vo UdDilhLaems O8AB9) 440 US Big? 3. Can this Court Settle the Arispute Arcana, Cyrenit s ( Nath, Tenth and Zleventh ) on cohetlee a arsmissal foc Las luce oO ; . Rrosecate Counts ak a Ddoetcan 14S Ske le! Contec! . ; tleted v oe oteay oe Reson uss 2d WIZ roth Ce Zou) L Baker vi Com. GBoc, B2Ze Fad \27B UK Cue Zste y bof UU