No. 18-7312
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: coerced-confession criminal-procedure due-process in-re-gault ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel juvenile-confession juvenile-rights postcard-denial strickland-standard williams-v-taylor
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
DueProcess FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. MAY THIS COURT'S DECISION IN STRICKLAND V. WASHINGTON AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES THE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL? Il. MAY THIS COURT'S DECISION IN IN RE GAULT AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES A COERCED CONFESSION BY A JUVENILE? III. MAY THIS COURT'S DECISION IN WILLIAMS V. TAYLOR AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES A POSTCARD DENIAL? i
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent Kansas to respond filed.
2018-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Kansas
Toby Crouse — Office of Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Respondent
Toby Crouse — Office of Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Respondent