Whether the Tenth Circuit correctly concluded that Mr. Templeton had waived his argument that the evidence was insufficient to support increasing Mr. Templeton's base offense level by four levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Tenth Circuit correctly concluded that Mr. Templeton had waived his argument that the evidence was insufficient to support increasing Mr. Templeton’s base offense level by four levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) because there was no spatial connection between the firearms and the marijuana sale where Mr. Templeton’s counsel plainly objected that there was no evidence to support the enhancement. i NO. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term 2018 LEWIS TEMPLETON, Petitioner, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.