Whether the trial court and administrative agency denied petitioner due process and equal protection rights by terminating him from a program without an informal hearing

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L. WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT WITN OBLINK AGENC ___ MS. TENNTE ROWEN, DENTED P TONER HIS DUE PROCESS OF LAV On [UTIONAL RIGHTS AY R NG TO ALLOW HIM AN INFORMA HEARING, A R TERMINATING RIM FROM THE PROGRAM, AND f\ NG CRIMINAL ACTION FOR AN ° D THAT SHOULD Qe WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENTED DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL OF COMMERCE, FOR REFUSING TO ALLOW PETITIONER AN OPPORT ___UNTTY FOR TNFORMAL HEARTNG AT THE LOCAL LEVEL, _3. WHETHER PETITIONER FOURTH AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL ___ RIGHTS, ALSO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS SUCH AS ART. T 810.Fx POST FACTO. ___ LAW TMPATRING THE OBLIGRTTONS OF CONTRACTS, BY LEADING _ PROSECUTOR ALLOWING PETONER TO BE TRY, AND CONVICTED FOR ___CREMTNAL MATTERS, WHERE ALL FVDENCE SUCH AS WIA, AGBEEN : 0 6 ETITON ___ACTTONS AND CONDUCT COULO ONLY BE AN CIVTL MATTER. a 4. WHETHER PETITIONER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, WHERE VIOLATED ___BY fils, Lavan PB WATSON, WITH U.S, DEPARTMENT OF LAROR, BY NOT __ _ ALIEGTNG NO VIOLATIONS OF WIA STATUTE AND REGULATTONS, To