Are Recusal Statutes 28 U.S. Code §455 and §144 Unconstitutionally Vague?

Questions Presented 1. Are Recusal Statutes 28 U.S. Code §455 and §144 Unconstitutionally Vague? 2. Must the decision be overturned as Due Process is denied/impossible in the Third Circuit — as | displayed by evidence of crimes by Judges and facts exist which show "Pervasive Bias"? 3. Does Due Process require that : a. Impartial "civilians" must decide recusal — if there exists evidence of crimes by Judges; b. Limits be placed on "term" on the bench: c. Parties be anonymous (if feasible); d. Change of venue be given for review of decisions; e. Complaints of Judicial Misconduct must be determined publicly and by impartial civilians; f. Any/all complaints of criminal acts by jurists be presented to a grand jury; g. Require that transfer of cases out of the Circuit be made for any/all cases of allegations of apparent "Pervasive Bias"?