No. 18-7329
Phillip Dale Selfa v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-prosecution double-jeopardy dual-sovereignty due-process federal-state-jurisdiction presumption-of-innocence prosecutorial-misconduct prosecutorial-vindictiveness
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment Takings
FifthAmendment Takings
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the prophylactic presumption of prosecutorial vindictiveness (North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1982)) apply when two different sovereigns are involved in the original and the subsequent prosecution of the accused?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Does the prophylactic presumption of prosecutorial vindictiveness (North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1982)) apply when two different sovereigns are involved in the original and the subsequent prosecution of the accused? i
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)
Attorneys
Phillip Selfa
Gene David Vorobyov — LAW OFFICE OF GENE VOROBYOV, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent