Whether the alleged facts that Defendant Duggan intentionally discriminated against Reyes (suspect class) states a claim for violation of the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ‘ The questions presented are: 1 Whether the alleged facts that Defendant Duggan intentionally discriminated against Reyes (suspect class). whereby impeding the timely filing of his perfected petition , and, denied him access to courts whereby preventing the filing of his perfected ancillary complaintin the form of Application to an Individual Justice, containing pleadings for relief, states a claim for violation of the First, Fifth, and, Fourteenth Amendments tao the United States Constitution, and. as a consequence did the Court of Appeals by holding that it doesn't-, and, denying Reyes's, motion for the appointment af counsel on appeal, abuse it's discretion, and, did, prejudice ensue from the loss of the right ta trial by jury, in contemplation af the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution 2. Whether the kind of allegatians made by Reyes, makes the constitutional claims invoked by him self-enforcing and, sa did the Court of Appeals commit to prejudicial errarwhereby affirming the District Court's Order simultaneously dismissing Reyes's, claim with prejudice, and, charging him with a strike, pursuant to section 1915A(b)(1) of the United : States Code ; , 4A ;