Whether the lower court denial of modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) based on a mandatory guidelines range departure's sentence violates Congress' intent?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; ; I. Whether The Lower Court Denial Of Modification Of Sentence Under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) Based On A Mandatory Guidelines Range Departure's Sentence Violates Congress' Intent? If Yes, Is This Court's Decision To Exciséd::.! Two Provisions Of The Sentencing Reform Act In United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) A Substantive Rule That Is Retroactive To Pre~Booker Cases? ~ II. Whether U.S.S.G. §1B1.10--Amendments 782 And 750 Denies : Due Process Because It Gives District Courts Authority To Distinguish Between A Certain . Class Of Defendants To Be Resentenced ? If Yes, | a Should U.S.S.G. §1B1.10(b)(1); And U.S.S.G. §5G1. 1(b) Governing Reductions Under §3582(c)(2) Be Excised to Achieve Uniformity ? | Lii :