No. 18-7348
Edgar Arnold Garcia v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 18-USC-3582c2 criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing dillon-v-united-states district-court-discretion due-process legal-error sentence-modification sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-methodology statutory-interpretation statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Dillon v. United States requires reevaluation of original sentencing methodology in sentence modification proceedings under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER, DILLON v. UNITED STATES, 560 U.S. 817 (2010), REQUIRES A DISTRICT COURT TO REEVALUATE ITS ORIGINAL SENTENCING METHODOLOGY IN STEP TWO OF THE TWO-STEP INQUIRY ESTABLISHED. IN : ' SENTENCE MODIFICATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER TITLE 18 U.S.C. n § 3582(c)(2), WHERE THE ORIGINAL METHODOLOGY EMPLOYED AT SENTENCING CONSTITUTES LEGAL ERROR THAT RESULTED IN A SENTENCE THAT ECXEEDS THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM, AND THE DISTRICT'S DENIAL OF § 3582(c)(2) RELIEF RELIES SOLELY ON THAT ERROR A ii
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)
2018-05-22
Application (17A1279) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until July 23, 2018.
2018-05-10
Application (17A1279) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 24, 2018 to July 23, 2018, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Edgar Garcia
Edgar Arnold Garcia — Petitioner
Edgar Arnold Garcia — Petitioner
Edgar Arnold Garcia — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent