No. 18-7352
Giovanni Ellis v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment as-applied-challenge civil-rights commerce-clause constitutional-challenge constitutional-limits due-process federal-firearms-law federal-regulation firearm-possession firearms interstate-commerce intrastate-possession second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional because it exceeds Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, and is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate possession of a firearm and ammunition?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is facially unconstitutional because it exceeds Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause, and is unconstitutional as applied to the intrastate possession of a firearm and ammunition? i
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)
Attorneys
Giovanni Ellis
Lynn Palmer Bailey — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent