Whether the principles of finality still apply, especially in a case where the foundational terms of a specifically negotiated and agreed upon plea bargain were breached

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED THESE. .TWo (2) QUESTZOWS ARE THE ComPLEZE, FOUNDATZONS. OF QuR LAWS. . SQ SoeZETY ZISKLF!!THERE ARE No GREATER QUEST ZONS OF IAW moRE ZM=_ _—RORTANZ.TO_THE PUBLZC-PERTOD!) THas case zs. uvzouc! so nel mes _| ‘_.. Z must also state Het Zam Nor challenging the Constitutional ity. uf Registaction «ZAM challenging Ws applccbon +o me, whom the ~Coutts (oRzezwatty!) deemed “72 nor BE a Sex Offender! Nox under. tere. Reguirements w= The Questions areas. folloiws,. | #11) DothE PRIME IPLES. OF FZWALZTY count any mone! Especially. -dna.case where thE FouNDAT ZONAL TERMS of aSpeezEzCAly _. _-. AGREED APOn 3 NEGOTZATED FoR CUSTOM PLEA” were Breached, J _(LLAW MADE WORTHLESS Dan. with o Gollatera) Attack Grounds —. _| .. -. edesvon! Ci THas case aS unezie Any caste” EvER’ 70 DATE)” _ #2) Do We Courts (arate!) uphold usfay 8 our Constitution lly Pron . .. tected Rightts 70 ee zeEAzep (rexep!) AS zWDaVZDUALS-aNymo RE! _ —_(Emghesis_in, NO CouRT 16 DATE HAS.A DDRESSED. THE UN TAME. 1 BORRABLE” TuRzsDZC7ZONALS, FOUNPAT ZONAL ERRORS ZSSUES THAT. WERE PRESEW7 E070. THEM! WZTH EXTREME PRESUDZCE))? OUR LAWS WERE DESZEMED BY OUR FORE FATHERS. To FLOW Td PROB-_. LREMS!! THEY WERE NoT.MENT To BE MAWZPULAZED SzEwoRED BY SERESZALS TELZNG 70 GET PERSONAL GAZM BY MANZPULATZVE. .. DESZGNS "OUT oF ZHEMBY ZENORZNG (CONTRELZG 1) ZSSURS OF OUR Laws PROBLEMS % ZAM NOT ZA PRISON BECSUSE MY CASE DOES NOT WAVE MERZTS! FoR 27 pos! ZAM ZN PRESON(WRONGEULY!) BECAUSE OF FZCZALS DO MoT. WANT My (4 CUSTOM )ZSSURS/ GROUNDS. To Come. [Te eter Mey. Ged help asf Eventhough we have Prasaken him u Tw