No. 18-7363

Christopher David Krohe v. Zandra Steinhardt

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-review district-court due-process facts judicial-remedy money-damages remedy standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess HabeasCorpus Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

If the district court should not have denied case on its resolution of facts presented & If the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals should not have denied appeal on facts presented on case, what remedy is available for petitioner

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. If the district court should not have denied case on its resolution of facts presented. & 2. If the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals should not have denied appeal on facts presented on case, “what remedy is available for petitioner" ? 3. In the above civil rights action & suit for money . unaccounted , and or missused can the above entitled U.S. Supreme Court adopt information independent to address all issues presented? 4. In order to uphold the rights of the petitioner "Does the United States Constitution protect petitioner from claim against respondent "? . 5. If so may the court reverse vacate ,and amend the Fedéral District Court's opinion? : . t ‘a a

Docket Entries

2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 11, 2019)

Attorneys

Christoher Krohe
Christopher David Krohe — Petitioner
Christopher David Krohe — Petitioner