Whether the district courts retained jurisdiction to entertain claims that the trial court directing a grand jury and judges to deliberate with statutory presumption based on accusations of forcible sexual offenses for which petitioner was denied and convicted

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4) Sheovid have Mhe WHaleus Disicice Coucks retaned Juris dickicn Xo entertain claims. that the terial couck directing a grand Jory ,and JULOCS XO. de\\berake. with Srakutowu, cama. presomphio as. bas ed_on accusations of foscible sexual often Ses foc which. Jedisroner was.dcied and comuicked 2 . Z)Yoes the prancigle laws of this County atfveck ar cendec So imper bral. ee bunal ther waceanted Rnkecuentionoc_ Ww OLS. SVE ‘GI Cour pe acdtice. Lh -re tle Sa. , ee Joel 4.30 uss, wnscleke fowl cP ofefles Stetes’ Policy CU LC diy ~ i ‘ a are + et AIS EATUAAGING, : OCR SUA GUENESS vad. as app ed Challenge DP . 4. Does Such Pole “OAs ii = ; : \ CoOnseyt 4 Pos me od. | 3. Che. Pokey VOIOE os. Deokect Vest Amendment Vickiaee eclarakions oc result censorship? ws O) Ace Pep. , ob): LL. lec ms WH. Tava 49 polect Fublic “Anteres+ Me Reputation and ate, oO :