Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court erred in denying jurisdiction over the District Court's decision, in light of this Court's precedents recognizing the best interest of the child standard

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : In her brief to this Court, Feldman cities several Florida statutes in support. — See, e.g., Fla. Statue 63.063, 787.01, 984.02. But she doesn’t cite any federal . : statues in her complaint or. in her brief. 1. Did the Eleventh Circuit Court err by denying jurisdiction over the Districts Court’s decision, where the appeal sought review of the District Court’s determination. In light of this Court’s precedents consistently rec’: ognizing that a decision should be determined and based on the best interest of the child standard. Were mine and my granddaughters 1st, 6th and 14th amendments rights violated during this adoption proceeding and unnecessarily separated/isolated from family bonds? 2. Did the courts and Adoption Star assure my granddaughters present and future well-being are protected by allowing an illegal, fraudulent and unnecessary adoption for profit to proceed? ; ; Gause lout 3. Why did the Eleventh Circuit Court state I had standing and € cy jastdid not state the law, when mine and my granddaughter’s constitutional rights are THE LAW? ; 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26. 1-1 Counsel for Appeal Jennifer Feldman certifies that the following may have an interest in the outcome of this case: . 1) Adoption Star Agency Inc., Crissy Kathy, Katy Jay 2) DCF Family Services; Roy Frometa; Child Protective Investigator 3) E.K (Adoption Attorney) 4) Jackson Memorial Hospital: Labor and Delivery; Prenatal Care. 5) J.S (Baby Father) : 6) M.M, SE (Adoptive Family) 7) M.S (Adopted Baby) 8) N.F (Birth Mother) e ; 9) S.L (Adoption Social Worker) , | | . spectfull Submitted, Jennifer Feldman Self-Represented . . 3