Oscar Armando, aka Oscar Armando Sarres Mendoza v. Gerald Wayne Whitfield, et al.
Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated when the prison confiscated his legal materials without proper notice or opportunity to be heard
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED To. AssiSltanT Warden Aber ph. L). Di db you or dd you 20T Signed on The Confiscet on Form datect Avgust o¢dole 2.) Dd you knew Theft The Petitioner has on going Legal GCHOn AgainsT The Direc7or OF TDC The slate ClassiftCofior and Records OFFICe_? | hy pwed Mr Wit field and. 3. ThoTs he ee Ne 10) ne Laullibrery 7 YJ.) pow many Grievantle Complaint A eee hee : kgs perrtre™ hod pee. allem your | SO. de a thet Ro-ptelation. he SuPer pos all 7 Custody? Op Render piled im Court: 6). Mr. Wihdtriel. Theres oe. : Armando 7 | ins You: beside Oster ‘Ox form dafeck Again The Con fiscoPi ee ay, Aid you signed > jugust ou, 9°! @ pn the Amarille Gut p. do you Knows ay College | ‘ 0 ? | close Fen d. é ConrfisCefior focr~7 1 Gasset did yor sygned Oe ed docmnte? q. Mr f you Conpiscete POT Rofeliobe bin }0 ae “ cod whptered WSS NCB Hew you