No. 18-739
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review case-revival constitutional-compliance dismissal-with-prejudice double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment judicial-discretion jury jury-trial lee-v-us res-judicata
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment DueProcess Securities
FifthAmendment DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a state appellate court revive a case that was dismissed with prejudice after a jury was sworn?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW May a state appellate court revive a case that was dismissed with prejudice after a jury was sworn merely because the appellate court disagrees with the trial court’s announced dismissal with prejudice and comply with the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as interpreted by Lee v. U.'S., 432 US. 23, 30 (1977)?
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Petition DENIED.
2018-12-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent Tennessee to respond filed.
2018-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Tennessee
Leslie E. Price — Tennessee Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Leslie E. Price — Tennessee Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Trevor Wallace
Gregory D. Smith — Law Offices of Gregory D. Smith, Petitioner
Gregory D. Smith — Law Offices of Gregory D. Smith, Petitioner