No. 18-7390
Martin R. Stancik v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal appeal-waiver circuit-split constitutional-error constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process sentencing sixth-circuit waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant's waiver of his right to appeal a sentence includes a waiver of the right to appeal a later, unforeseen constitutional due process violation by the sentencing Court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a criminal defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal a sentence includes a | waiver of the right to appeal a later, unforeseen constitutional due process violation by the sentencing Court. ii
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2019)
Attorneys
Martin Stancik
Steven Richard Jaeger — The Jaeger Firm PLLC, Petitioner
Steven Richard Jaeger — The Jaeger Firm PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent