No. 18-7395
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-materiality brady-v-maryland criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence-suppression exculpatory-evidence materiality-standard prosecutorial-misconduct suppressed-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), does the materiality standard require that the suppressed evidence directly go to proving any count against a defendant?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), does the materiality standard require that the suppressed evidence directly go to proving any count against a defendant? ii
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-04
Waiver of right of respondent West Virginia to respond filed.
2019-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 13, 2019)
Attorneys
West Virginia
Lindsay Sara See — Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, Respondent
Lindsay Sara See — Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, Respondent
Wilfred H.
Jeremy Benjamin Cooper — Blackwater Law PLLC, Petitioner
Jeremy Benjamin Cooper — Blackwater Law PLLC, Petitioner