Does the D'Oench, Duhme doctrine permit the NCUA to ignore proper evidence, statutes of limitations, affirmative defenses, and federal law?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The Sixth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict rendered in the Northern District of Ohio. Three questions are presented: 1. Does this Court’s holding in D’Oench, Duhme & Co., Inc. v. FDIC permit the NCUAB to ignore proper evidence, statutes of limitations, affirmative defenses, and federal law? 2. Does the D’Oench, Duhme Doctrine permit the NCUA and its liquidating agent, the NCUAB, to use forged paperwork created by the individual who masterminded the largest credit union theft in United States history and then use him to verify the paper as against innocent depositors? 3. Does 12 U.S.C. § 1787(p)(2) permit the NCUAB to claim reliance upon the “official written agreements” in the credit union’s books and records when they know those books and records deceived the NCUA, outside auditors and the Credit Union Board for years?