Did the United States Court of Appeals err in denying Petitioner's appointment of counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (. Did fhe Unitel States Cork & AAQReals Nous fs Deseretton When Derydrg Yeose Yerttiones Wmoiroeat of Robmo Counsel 2. Mh Me thothed Sedkes (ouek a Ngieals ts hen [Faking Reondent’s Dletions {i Suwwnenly oN tenance Oren ee Clade on AQQeak Cheatly Cihed Yhak Pstetek Corse Sade acted ith Utadtedtvenese aad wade ANG rents on behalf of ASendant’s hen Tuled Pon Nhese Wes case mens | BL Wil the Ceted Deedes Couch oF Meals Uoleke Quitenets Fight be 6 Claw and Fie heastag, ta Welakton of Abe Feactusitly Muunbvenk Waited Areles Constitution Sy Tartana ho Teach tre warts of the Claims on appeal? 4, Did te United Seated Courk of Agqeals Uiclate Petiktoncr's Wooraan hicks andes Nidelds Vy) 35) by XB, Ay toy Why BOW y (44), iA, 2% , ard Bo on Nae Waivessal Deeharaktong of Kuan Reqes Sy \anamat Agrees Sevnessy oiewaaee anielr dented Qerntoncs’s Tig hes Lo a ity \reacoaoy aad bia andlor cw etreekive Feoudy Su a Condchenk Hatteda| Ketouneks Per aeks Wlolestbad Mae Fede urcental Plants qranted \itue by ne Conakihuhion of boa law? 5 Did he Care States Court of ApPeals Ulolake Peditlones's Tabs to Dae Riceess wader Nrerdorent Feuarteen , United States Constitution , When Festi bo Cowie a hrc 4udqe Fane UPR A Pikthion Cor Vane Rehearing 2