Stephen Daniel Leonard v. Florida, et al.
Did the Court of Appeals violate Petitioners' Fourteenth Amendment rights by refusing to vacate all orders after Ms. Leonard's amended complaint
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1 Did the oust of Appeals éce When Feraading Win Aske OAS Ke Yatake Ath overs entered asics Ws. Leonards CuPlalit Was Ted % 2. Did the Coark of Appeals Yloleke Pesthiomers Fourteenth Anerderent Rights be Leas Kuastecys hin orderlig Khe LuT. fo Vaecke atl orders after ts. Leonesd Cad An avended ComPlarnd Cousingy the LT. ke Adsmiss the Case % a, DA the Courk of Agcals Nioleke Pekictoners Touckecntl Nyendoest Rafat buy Fecing, bo Crack re veeriks of he Chatus Presented 4 Dik Qe Count & Apgeas Wielake Rearronet’s te de nove Pewlend under tele TE buy Vecttog ke Cente the Clatos Prisened % 5, Dik the Guce of Agpeals Yicleke Rerdionc’s Kaoren “Kiqhks Under Hae Cniversar Declacation of Lonan Rights Nereles 15253 ,5,6,+¢ B, VU, i ID 2B and 2 Ahren Taviting ko Teeth We Werks of (lature Presented , Cektac ko Conduek de nove Senders under & 2% N.S-6-& 36 (E(B) ates »Lausstng We LT, bo dteuigs the Case vand Aen ing Feheasing