No. 18-741
Emily M. Odermatt v. Amy Way, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech government-benefits pickering pickering-test public-employment public-service public-services
Key Terms:
Environmental FirstAmendment
Environmental FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Pickering, the government's ability to remove a valuable financial benefit on the basis of the beneficiary's exercise of free speech exceeds the speaker's exchange or performance of public services on behalf of the government?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED _ Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Pickering, the government’s ability to remove a valuable financial benefit on the basis of the beneficiary’s exercise of free speech exceeds the speaker’s exchange or performance of public services on behalf of the ; government? . ~N
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-08
Waiver of right of respondent Amy Way, et al. to respond filed.
2017-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Amy Way, et al.
Devin Andrew Slack — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Devin Andrew Slack — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Scott Shorr — Respondent
Scott Shorr — Respondent