No. 18-7410
Walter A. Kott, Jr. v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure district-court due-process federal-courts fifth-circuit judicial-review legal-precedent petitioner-claim precedent standing supreme-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Punishment
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States District Court, Eastem District of Louisiana and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals mis-applied clearly established Supreme Court law in evaluating petitioner's claim?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the United States District Court, Eastem District of Louisiana and Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals mis-applied clearly established Supreme Court law in evaluating petitioner’s claim? Whether the Louisiana State Courts and United States District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana relied on inapplicable case authority In evaluating petitioner's claim ?
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.
2018-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2019)
Attorneys
Darrel Vannoy