No. 18-7415

Anthony James Scott v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-01-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law alcohol-regulation civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process judicial-review legal-interpretation local-ordinance preemption procedural-rules state-constitution statutory-provisions transportation-of-alcohol
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an officer could have reasonably entertained a good faith belief that a local ordinance prohibiting the transportation of alcohol in public was lawful

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED THIS Petition Presents the. Glowing issues Or revel: . 1. Whether an officer aould have reagonably . ertertained o Sood faith behef G local ordinance frohibiting the transtortation of alcoho) IN Public. Was fausfu); Lahere, Since. January | 157 the california. Constitution ide XX section 22, 7 β€œic excuse naht bes aidated jinat the Stale. has the. Ara nstor: fettion of Alegholic. loeverages Wsithin) the. State,” And where, In Spmilar Context, two Publish Cases held that local Ordinance. Pre birbiting the. POSES ION Of aldhol hove been PreemPted by the Ca\\forni tonairfution, Such thet urhalding the denial of A Suppression Motion Would be Proper? ,

Docket Entries

2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
2018-10-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2019)

Attorneys

Anthony James Scott
Anthony Scott — Petitioner
Anthony Scott — Petitioner
California
Stephanie BrenanCalifornia Department of Justice - Office of the A, Respondent
Stephanie BrenanCalifornia Department of Justice - Office of the A, Respondent