No. 18-7423
Rodney Washington v. Gary A. Boughton, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights court-discretion criminal-procedure dna-evidence dna-profile double-standard due-process ex-post-facto legal-precedent perjury retroactive-application statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What constitutes a specific DNA profile for the purposes of tolling the statute of limitations?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED A. tha Ga counk OF Aoviple Vecisind 12 CooMict wir heer US. Cova o& PAQuns Weses Vrak naz simian mud Slike | pael Meo One Vwrked Sates Supreme eouck wh paved Acero B, Vis ume is baeed on a doubly Shaudand a sek oF yee’ ples yermelns spoken oypowrvirtty For OPT Unes oF yeoge Voy Tot piven yulhich nd Vend diescty oe Weicins Raseuhis OO eeT ee er ee Ee ee —
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent Boughton, Warden to respond filed.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2018-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 14, 2019)
Attorneys
Boughton, Warden
Clayton Patrick Kawski — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Rodney Washington
Rodney Washington — Petitioner