Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant patent law statutes

No question identified. : (\\ Con Na Medreet hactmart VR as RS Le VOI Medic Lhancad Yack a \" eae eockils sles lagna \, \\ {ee Cows Mel cal Nol, Jacobi ra Shobor inp «lhl os\Ne aoe meg” (Wes Mo \ ower Cooks (Yours Ince Nacrebion \. Warksisinn, Summos Aus nh A \oose i Wonders Yaron Want hasicion GN ty Carnal Wbel fetal hana Dpglon Bates [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. coer eats athe pentcesting in the court whose judgment is the eubject of this petition is as follows: enue A Ys le (a Ven Yall), oer ‘azattals b mex Neston ont cuvean Vopeatenen § Cees Lions on : : Anas Sasbaazus lop. a \scan ood Jerse Nell, coro Vi son noege. Vyasa heute Weedan 3 heros \Noucpnlvradtiond Cobar Pele She Mets PAN\Y wasboa ie (innaets on adsense. ask iste Medical Sein Aves Caction sation bine. \ ule. prosie3 -\y ‘lo ‘Vado bee lonnaction wtions Nee Delf eet lactams lrcle Sleek a le. Coote maa Joao Weccl Verses Sagas we he DONG Krad \ om J rnrcte edies Vaevena Gsracsiage