Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which an individual, who as an 'Honorable' member of the legal profession, disrepute with impunity the Legal System, the Rule of Law and the Constitution?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which an individual, who as an “Honorable” member of the legal profession, disrepute with impunity the Legal System, the Rule of Law and the Constitution? By exercising its right to refusal of this appeal, the United States Supreme Court converts that individual into a person who is above the law. 2) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which an individual who, while a member of the legal profession, commits a federal crime by destroying the rural mailbox of the Defendant and also commits a hate crime by replacing the destroyed mailbox of it’s Hispanic owner with the American flag? Bellow is a link showing retired Judge Robert J. Kowalski committing the above mentioned crimes which gave birth to the Circuit Court defamation action https:/Awww. youtube. 3) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which the Plaintiff, who as a member of the legal profession, committed similar acts of defamation against the Defendant, thus presenting an action by a litigant having “unclean hands’? Bellow is a link to “THE SHITWEASEL’ a video created by the Plaintiff, retired Judge Robert J. Kowalski and defaming the character of Defendant Armando Villa. httos:/Awww. 4) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which the Circuit Judge unjustly sided with the Plaintiff and did not dismiss the Plaintiffs case that was presented by a Plaintiff with “unclean hands’? 5) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which the Plaintiff, a former Circuit judge, initiates a domino of corruption within the Illinois legal system in order to protect himself? 6) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which the Jo Daviess County Clerk conveniently “forgets” to include the majority of Defendant's exhibits into the Record of Appeal? 7) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which the Jo Daviess County Clerk conveniently “forgets” to include an important Defendant's Court Transcript, where the Plaintiff admits being the creator of the defamatory video called “THE SHITWEASEL’”? 8) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which the Clerk of the Illinois Second District Appellate Court called the Appeal bullshit and compared it to “pissing into the wind”? Since when | talked with Mr. Mangan, the Clerk of the Illinois Second District Appellate Court, he called my appeal bullshit, then | recorded him and | uploaded the recording on the Internet. One can hear what Mr. Bob Mangan, said about my Appeal in the following link https:/Awww. 9) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which the two Courts of Appeal of the State of Illinois denied the appeal without giving any reasons? 10) Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal of a case in which the Defendant was unjustly ordered to pay $500,000.00 to the Plaintiff, a case that should have never be tried for the reasons above? 11) | Why would the United States Supreme Court refuse to hear the Appeal from a citizen who’s Constitutional Rights were violated by the Justice System of the State of Illinois? 12) Why is it that being 35 minutes late in electronically filing the Appellant's Petition for Rehearing (with the Appeliate Court of the Second District of Illinois) it is sufficient reason to justify the denial of the Appeal? The deadline for the submission of the Petition for Rehearing was March 28, 2018 at 11:59 PM. Due to the slowness of the Odyssey server, the files finally uploaded 35 minutes late, on March 29, 2018 at 12:35 AM. As confirmed by the attached Exhibits, near around the time of the filing the Petition for Rehearing, the operators of the Odyssey system confir