Whether the U.S. Appeals Court for the Eleventh Circuit erred in denying petitioners' COA, when petitioners raise jurisdictional issues that can be raised at any time, resulting in illegal sentences

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 2. Th Ate. sited tates. Arreal4Covat. FoR Ane Eleventh. Ciatvit iS . ERROR, because it Denied PEtitionend COA, Whew PEtitioneRs __LIRing. ARE TorgSictional. Lssues. that Ca take Teris dictionsal --_Netice At Any time , Which. Means that Petitioners SENTENCES. ARE illegal Sve te. the doris Sictional Ls50e5. having No __-Twrisdictien 46 Render the Conviction’ AnS impose the _ Sewtenice 2? KM. Thue WS. Apreais. (ovat Fon Te Lleventth Ciatuit is aror, _becavse it DewieS. Petitioners (6.4, When. PEt Homers. Cains. Wag Never independesty Au$. GSiciaity Rev (ewed by wy of The ——Prejons Appeals. boats Sue to. ASoPting the. PRe-SaaFted R&R . oF THE Response From THE |KowER LooRt he, Whos. Claims Show A. GER ong Question oF UZ. londtitutiondal Law ? WM. sae 4. Areas Cooat For THe levenlth Ciacuit iv Gavor, ~. because it DewieS Petitiewers (5.4, Whe Petition’eR WAS denied the OPPoRtowsity 46 RegponsS And WAS Clearly denieS AN . iderttane NeaRinig Which I> us ConFtcet with WS: Censtitotenal x. Ab ‘he Ui Aepenis [ovat For Aue Eleventh Cincuit iv Cerok, because wae UE DEwte PEtifeasers (.6.A ; Wheat Petitoser Was Denies HigBott Amendment RGU to Effective Counsel bumranstees by THE _._Cendtitution of HE U4. Law 2 Ws The us Apecals (oat For Me Eleventh Ciacuit w ear because —__.it DEWieS Petitioners C.0.A, When PetitioneR Was DinieS Wis. Bh Amendmes€ Right te A Faia-Teiat by AS Xmeartiat Toey.. buarasteeS by Te Conttitution of Ung. FeSeaal Law ? . Mi. La Te Ua. Aopeatd [ovrt For THe dlevertth Ciatu't inf Eaaor, because _ it DewteS Petitioners 0.0.4, Wheat Petitioner Was DENicd Nis. —.. Fevateenth LIN%) Amendment RgvT te Sue Process Aub Mito te. ee Equal Prelection! of THe LAWS. Withins 45 TorisSictionl Guaranteed .. by The bewStitution of THE U.S. FeSena| Law Sue to THE State of _ —_ Wabamas, CRionindal Las. Ake ConStaucted uPent it5 190) IN x a AmenSme St State losdtitotion that Excludes TE Egual. —_PreTe ction oF THE Lan Clause...Wwhich (5. in-Suae ct. fonblice. | i With UZ. Federal Con dtitutionl And undee INE Ciatumstance, , OF Petitronters. Claims So Show ACleaR Sentialeok. Egual | __PreTection’ USSea ME LAW 2 coe ene | a 4 The US. Aeveals Count For We. Eleventh. Ciecuit inn. ~T ERRoR, because it's. Ro ling dAe. Conitaaay to hawt Whenl... _ Petitioner S MERited Claims Are..UnSigpuTed..b i THE. | Recon sb 2 ya sue, United Xrales. Appeals. Covat.ton THe Flevescth.. ___Cintuit inn Exner, because THE OnSeR AnS THE Following a Rulineg both Lenteadict one Another. ANE. Ree. Net based upon Bounsd Sudgemen't Ordea.? See (Aprensix.A).AaS J. 3 Te. US. Aereats (ovat Fon -THE _ Eleventh Circuit id. Eger ——_., becrvge tt Dewied Petitic seas. C.0.A, Wher Petitioner. Was denied. Nig. Fourteenth (4 ) Amendment Right 46. DUE Process —__._ Awd Also E val Paslections of The Laws Within (35. Sopisdicrions ——Gunaenttech by he Constitution pt Tae Us, bat hee ——.-. PaesetuTenial Misconduct. by Te Mobile County Taial Count 2 LL