Bradley B. Miller v. Texas, et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether federal jurisdiction remains during the pendency of a removal
QUESTIONS PRESENTED This case presents issues related to the failure of the 330 Family District Court, Dallas County, Texas, to observe federal jurisdiction during a removal, and the subsequent failure of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to enforce federal jurisdiction under Title 28, U.S. Code § 1446. 1) Whether jurisdiction remains in federal court during the pendency of a removal. 2) Whether a state court must cease all proceedings in a case during the pendency of a removal. 3) Whether a federal court must enforce federal jurisdiction during the pendency of a removal. 4) Whether federal law applies to the states and state courts. 5) Whether judges have immunity from civil liability and criminal prosecution for rulings and orders issued during the pendency of a federal removal, i.e. without jurisdiction, and thus outside of any judicial capacity. i