No. 18-7450

Bradley B. Miller v. Texas, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-01-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: anti-injunction-act civil-liability civil-procedure federal-jurisdiction federal-law judicial-immunity removal removal-proceedings state-court-procedure state-courts supremacy-clause title-28
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-04-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether federal jurisdiction remains during the pendency of a removal

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This case presents issues related to the failure of the 330 Family District Court, Dallas County, Texas, to observe federal jurisdiction during a removal, and the subsequent failure of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to enforce federal jurisdiction under Title 28, U.S. Code § 1446. 1) Whether jurisdiction remains in federal court during the pendency of a removal. 2) Whether a state court must cease all proceedings in a case during the pendency of a removal. 3) Whether a federal court must enforce federal jurisdiction during the pendency of a removal. 4) Whether federal law applies to the states and state courts. 5) Whether judges have immunity from civil liability and criminal prosecution for rulings and orders issued during the pendency of a federal removal, i.e. without jurisdiction, and thus outside of any judicial capacity. i

Docket Entries

2019-04-29
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-02
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Bradley Miller
Bradley B. Miller — Petitioner
Bradley B. Miller — Petitioner