Whether the expert witness's report was improperly influenced by the witness's actions, resulting in a violation of due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1). Dr. Mevin, had not made Contact with a witness to the Crimmal Charges. The credibility of her report would have been Considered proper. 2). Can Dy. Mervin, get a written letter from a witne sse5 inacriminal Case, for a competency heoring_ 3). By law this witness influence making Contact with.a expert doing his ov her report for a level of Cbmpetence. 4). This hand written letter ly Ms. Riggins. veferved to a evaluation of the petitioner, thet prejudiced his . Competency hearing. 5). This witness is actions under aviolation of due pr. “ aeess of law. by Contact o expert doing his av hey ve port. 6). It isa due process vislation and fundamental error through mtormation in Dy. Meriny report that , a Say Inference the used of this writter letter in the case that prejudice the butcore . "). That the expert has been influenced hy passion by Prejudice. 8). Dispvove a fact which was of consequence té the outcome. of the action. Fla. Evidence § Yo. I (2664 ed.). 9). By the Conclusiveness af the inferences it Moy afford im reference to the litigated fact. .