Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals abuse discretion or err in denying petitioner's certificate of appealability?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . y™ 1) Dicl the winth Crew st Court of AppeALS Abus cliscrection OR ERR tN clen YING PelilionCRS LEAL/'ficate. of Appeal ability ? 1.) Cotcl ReASONALLEL. SURIS) RAL. IN INR. ARZATAS FavoR With Respect Io Wheathen his 11th Ameniclnen | Right fo clue. process Ancl A FAIR TRIAL WAS breachecl bY the. Ac/miss lon OF AlghLY PRIM CIAL. GANG Ev iclence. tv A TRIAL MWAERC THERE WAS Insufficient eviclewce b SLppoRT A GG chakoe is 8.) Coulcl ReASONALLE TURIST RULE. IN MA: ARZATESS favo with Reypect fo whetbeh his 11th Amenclment cI. PROCESS Right lo A FAIR TRIAL Ancl &ixXth amenclment Right Ib An ImpARWAl. JURY WERE breeachec! bY thé. Rial Cours PAIL RE bb chLLARC A misiRial oR halcl A ACAR IND KearReline SKK bias ° 4.) shoulcl this towrt CXCRCISE. LL'S TUR ischicTion UNcICER 28 USL. (287 (2) anel pant peTiTionth Reguest fa A LeRTIFicaTe Of App eal LiLitY te thiS Count IN Light of wnitecl States 58Y L138+ 235 (1713) P