Whether the Second District Court of Appeals erred in dismissing the petitioner's case

No question identified. : “ : 3 § 5 3 3g 5 > 2 x 2 4 a $ 3 543 bog Bf a 3 e w 3 , » 2 ® ¢ @ a : : : géa 4 ay y ys 3 5 : 32 3 ¥ 3 g 3 a : a w 3 t : : $23 43 2% 2 3 é 2 2 5 © So 3 2 EF . 8 : Roy a > Poo w % co 5 bs a 3 aes 6 3 st x 3 3 i) 2 ig > Pig : a 3 3 Ww i) a € 4 3 2 ¢ b : 7 2 ya now Ss ‘a Fd w i: i ¢ a i ay aa) 5 3 eC . z = 3 § se 5 4 2 5 3 2 ; 2 4 2 a 2 3 3 o & > gy 5 3 e o& q fa o ri) hae ao. 23 w vo oa a eo & vu s) w 2 Y vane e 3 : z 3 ; é : w a ne zt ow ¥ 3 ff a f ; : 2 g 2 3 2 R , © w woos vy w Be: 34 3 § a oe g 2 ane § n Fs = 2 ou vy 3 x 2 4 %& & + § : ; ‘ 2 s&s 2 low a2 $3 5 2 a ; 3 : u 5 3 Fo4 i 6 4 F gos 6 4 5 sg) 3 2 9 3 = a & < Zoo * t 4 2 0 2 = ff 2 3 > £ & 2 ow 2 3 a 3 ¢ 2 od a =e vio 9 8 3: a, = 3 wv 2 5 4 5S 2g G ‘) Ey) 3 wi z zg 2 2 e 2 ag : 2 52 = 3 ios g > . 2 gf & «ws Na Ge 2 a 2 2 € eC a ov ¥ 3 | a ; ae 5 2 2% § a v vyoo93 f wy |} 4 5 b 3 S i > 2 Q ° b 2 Zz BS) 138 9 28 ay we Zz . 0 1 ¥ rm Pou o ¢ yy a oy © x 5 ae ey i ay vn 29 @ 3 4 4 9 aw ye 5 8 , a a ¢ og 3 7 3 vy < a) y ae) 2 2 = + 4 3 3 : =~ ¢ Y a) 9 £ a ys uv & o £ : 2 ¢ tg 3 2 22 5 5 2 ¢«¢ % a. 9 6 2 aq z 2 qa? > wow Sow Yo $ 3 a ¢ 2 3 ; 3735 * a e w e € 2 § 4 ; : 3 2 2 2 9 nn) a 3 ou g 3 y i 5 3° 2 # ys wh 23 F w 3 4 pay v oy r) c 2 ~ st) 2 » @& uw gg 2 ¥ 5 } gay a) SR ~ 2 3 y ¢# oy ey 6 3 é _ 5 3 g g 8 ¢ 2 9 > a w Q e@ ¢ a3 zl 3 4 Fe 3 ; E 2 Ww a a Ss 4 2 . < §$ xr 3 g v Pg : " 5 : . : 3g zx 2 & y 3 ’ ow w a a = M # & z 2 3 ? =) 7 . . wu 5 ° 3 . i ;