Constitutionality-of-the-entire-docket-vanishing-from-the-public-records

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Constitutionality, of the entire docket vanishing from the public records of the Supreme Court of New York, New York County. Shortly after filing the civil complaint in the district court. Tantamount to a de facto expungement. 2. Whether the district court abused its discretion by dismissing Petitioner’s complaint before any defendant’s answered the duly served summonses. 3. Whether the district court abused its discretion by certifying that any appeal taken by Petitioner would not be taken in good faith; before any defendant’s : answered the duly served summonses. 4. Constitutionality, of the district court holding a State, Judges, Prosecutors, ~ Attorneys, Doctors and Private Parties may not be liable for acts under color | of law. Even when acts are of bad faith or malice. 5. Constitutionality, of criminal charges being levied against State Actors, Judges, Prosecutors, Attorneys, Doctors and Private Parties. For acts under the color of a state “statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage” pursuant to: 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242. By a private citizen who brings a civil action pursuant to: 42 U.S.C. §§§ 1983, 1985, and 1988, respectively. 6. Whether the court of appeals abused its discretion amending the caption in the above styled cause, to reflect the designation of duly served to reflect only Defendant. As so not to be subjected to the jurisdiction of the court of appeals, thereof. 7. Questions of constitutionality, as previously presented to this court, by application for Writ of Certiorari docket number: 16-8110. And, Writ of Habeas Corpus docket Number: 16-8663, regarding the subject matter. i