Whether the 'knowingly' provision of 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2) applies to both the possession and status elements of a 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) crime?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the “knowingly” provision of 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2) applies to both the possession and status elements of a 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) crime? This Court recently granted certiorari to address this question in Rehaif v. United States, No. 17-9560. 2. Whether expert testimony concerning a defendant’s intellectual disability and mental health conditions — such as Petitioner’s full-scale IQ of 61 and diagnosis of schizophrenia paranoid type — is relevant and admissible to support a justification defense to a § 922(g) crime? 3. Whether a mandatory-minimum sentence of 15 years in prison violates the Due Process Clause and the Eighth Amendment, because the sentencing court is afforded no discretion to impose a lower sentence based on the defendant’s intellectual disability and mental health conditions? i