No. 18-7511
Edwin J. Ortiz-Fagot v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-3582-c-2 criminal-statute due-process non-delegation retroactive-application sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-modification statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court's modification of a sentence via 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to include deciding whether to retroactively apply the plain language of the criminal statute U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(1) within an authorized 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 'proceeding' violates the Constitution's Due Process Clause and non-delegation principle
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : , modification: via 3553(A); include deciding whether to : retroactively apply the plain language of the criminal statute 1B1.10(B)(1)... Inside a authorized [782,788] : 3582,(C)(2) "proceeding", violate the Constitution's Due Process Clause, and non-delegation principle? | B i i
Docket Entries
2019-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2019.
2019-02-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Edwin J. Ortiz-Fagot
Edwin J. Ortiz-Fagot — #39228-069, Petitioner
Edwin J. Ortiz-Fagot — #39228-069, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent