Whether the district court and appeals court erred when they granted the defendant's motion to dismiss despite evidence submitted by the plaintiff that disputes material facts

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; 2 an ape ong OS et yeu dent hae but A Summ ag n_You hke EilhHe) +0 Kel&P have EVickeniee Se ON You Ao Kor fRoUeE YouR Clam. 2) pid He Diakicr anld Appents Loukb ERE When they @karlted Ald AP iRined Dehadast’s Motenl tok S*nMey Sul& meric IOhen Heke iS SVickwee submittect by App All nde thy PROVES SA BKE (KE Len ule Asputes 7 to MW Atetiiat. Facts? By Shbule Con steu iG & Prose plant tf 's Comp lhialt libeenlly hive TALE SAME ok MoKRE ULERAI Hy Fetanne to A f¥e se plpintift wits GOVEN MEL. Hes, DdISORAER? , 4) oes He Court have Av pbhSations 7 Point Out BEROBS pide bY PK) SE Pleuthth As Well AS BVE op poKtunlite, To COMKE CF stead OF Sdle/y Con AEINiNG ANA PENA 216 @