No. 18-7525
Delexsia Harris v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure evidence evidence-suppression federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-discretion old-chief-v-united-states prejudicial-evidence prejudicial-information prior-bad-acts rule-403
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the analysis utilized in Old Chief v. United States control in determining whether prejudicial information should have been excluded in the defendant's trial?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Should the analysis utilized in, Old Chief v. United States, (3519 US 172, 179; 117 Sict 644, 651 (1997), for supression of prior bad acts in relation to application of Federal Rules of Evidence §403, control in determining whether prejudicial information should , have been excluded in the defendant's trial? wee 'y . in . Delexsia Harris , Certiorari : Lo .
Docket Entries
2019-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
2019-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent